{"id":34077,"date":"2019-04-06T07:47:07","date_gmt":"2019-04-06T07:47:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pietheineek.nl\/?p=34077"},"modified":"2020-04-30T12:19:40","modified_gmt":"2020-04-30T12:19:40","slug":"square-salone-2019","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pietheineek.nl\/en\/news\/square-salone-2019","title":{"rendered":"Square – Salone 2019"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

05-04-2019 <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The presentation at the Salone del Mobile in Milan is always special because you only actually think about what you\u2019re doing when you\u2019re on your way there; everything comes together in the preceding weeks. This is perhaps the case more than ever this year. You could say we\u2019re making a \u2018nod to the conceptual\u2019. Not to the right, but more to the essence of what we made before. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

New but logical<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And we even have a theme: almost everything we are presenting is square. But what it\u2019s really about is that the designs are based on acting consequently and the consequence of an action. For instance, we saw a beam repeatedly across the thickest part into exact squares so that we are left with nothing but cubes. Or a step further: we use a beam to saw a box and make a block box using nothing but cubes in the same way from the core wood. In other words, the maximum number of largest possible cubes you can get out of one beam. Is it all worth it? I don\u2019t know. If nothing else, it says something about how I think and work, and you must first have worked like this in order to say that. I couldn\u2019t have made this at the beginning of my career. <\/p>\n\n\n\n